4 ways Trump’s U.S. presidency might influence global football
Written By
Given Donald Trump's renewed presidential posture, it is quite likely that his singular approach to issues of diplomacy, economics, and foreign policy will once again be the subject of interest.
Though his policies might appear uncorrelated with football, sports is global; thus, his presidency has the potential to have a major influence on the beautiful game, and for a variety of reasons, his leadership could greatly impact the most watched sport in the world.
Among these probable changes are those pertaining to investor flows, broadcasting rights, player transfers, and logistics. These impacts have great and life-altering potential, although they might not be immediately obvious.
Potential return of Russian investments and club participation
Football could benefit most from the way President Trump manages the US-Russia relationship, which is billed to be the most striking and immediate policy impact under this administration.
President Trump's first term was distinguished by a more conciliatory stance toward Russia, favouring communication over conflict with the European country. This was despite suggestions on whether Russia meddled in American elections being still under dispute. Should we return to this business approach, it is likely that the penalties imposed on Russian companies and oligarchs would either be lessened or erased totally.
Given the major influence Russian investors have had in European football for a good length of time, this move would have significant retributions.
Individuals like Roman Abramovich helped transform clubs like Chelsea into reputed international players before Russia's activities in Ukraine invited sanctions, so should Trump reduce the severity of these penalties, Russian investors could reclaim their financial strength, therefore influencing the amount of money splurged into European sport.
The relaxation of sanctions could cause governing bodies like UEFA and FIFA to reconsider their orientation regarding how they view Russian clubs and national teams, indicating a return to major competitions.
Although this comeback could boost European football's revenues and prestige, it also probably will cause moral discussions.
Teams and supporters who are strongly against war may contest these kinds of developments, which would threaten the harmony of the game and create conflicts among its players.
Middle Eastern ownership and sponsorship deals under scrutiny
The objectives Trump has set for his foreign policy, especially his wish for the United States to be energy independent, may make it more difficult for Gulf countries to get along with one another and may also impact the investments they make in European football clubs.
Apart from its frequently unfriendly attitude towards various Middle Eastern nations, the close links his government maintains with Israel have historically made the situation far more tense.
It is common knowledge that the most significant players in European football today are Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, who have granted sponsorships and made large financial investments in elite clubs like Manchester City, Paris Saint-Germain, and Newcastle United.
On the other hand, if Trump takes a more pro-Israel posture, these ties could sour, and investors from the Middle East might rethink their decision to support the sport.
Clubs that depend on money from Gulf nations could find it difficult to attract elite players and rich sponsorship deals should investments be completely cut off or decreased.
This could throw off the balance of competitiveness in European football by giving those teams less financial means and equal chances to succeed.
Teams inside areas like Asia, South America, or North America may thus search for other sources of funding, which would alter the worldwide football ecosystem.
Geopolitical tensions influencing club ties and competitions
For a very long period, the game of football has helped people from many backgrounds to connect and interact with one another. However, the development of geopolitical tensions may make it more difficult for multinational clubs to collaborate and compete with one another.
Trump's policies could aggravate already existing national divisions, thereby making it more challenging for groups like UEFA and FIFA to handle politically delicate circumstances.
Teams with strong policies could possibly want to avoid facing Israeli clubs or those extremely supportive of Israel.
Similar events have happened in the past, like when political tension caused the European Union Football Association (UEFA) to move a game between Maccabi Tel Aviv and Besiktas to a neutral stadium.
These kinds of problems could make planning and running worldwide events more challenging, which would aggravate already existing splits in the football community.
As politics and sports get increasingly entwined, football may lose some of its uniting appeal. Organising activities across national boundaries will become more challenging as a result.
Impact on the 2026 FIFA World Cup hosting partnership
The United States of America will co-host the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the globe's most expensive football trophy, along with Canada and Mexico, and attaining success will require joint cooperation. However, the immigration and trade policies Trump has employed in the past—especially those aimed at Mexico—may make it less likely that this alliance would flourish.
Should Trump choose to restore rigorous border restrictions and visa requirements, there is a chance that logistical issues will cause problems for players, supporters, and media members travelling.
Furthermore, stricter rules on labour and resources could prevent the completion of infrastructure projects, including the enhancement of stadiums and transportation systems.
Trump's trade policies—which include tariffs and border taxes—could also make it more challenging to negotiate sponsorships and commercial alliances, therefore compromising the tournament's capacity to create income.
These problems could make the tournament less successful and less united; so, FIFA and the nations hosting it will have to exercise extreme caution with regard to politics to guarantee that everything proceeds without any problems.
Conclusion
Although it would seem that Donald Trump's presidency has nothing to do with football, it is evident that it will have a major impact on the game that will be experienced for a good length of time.
His actions could change the way international football operates in a number of different ways, including the possible return of Russian investments, problems with Middle Eastern funding, and political tensions' effects on operations.
Given the growing political and financial entwine of football with other countries, the international football community has to be alert and ready to handle any changes that might come along.
Trump's election as president could provide fresh opportunities and challenges that might change the way governing bodies, players, and clubs react to the changing scene of the beautiful game.